Virtualized Server OS on Windows XP, Limitations?

Since XP Pro has a limit of 10 concurrent connections, I was wondering if a guest VMWare Server 2000 operating system would have the same limitations? (since it’s "going through" Windows XP?) Will it work different with Bridged vs NAT?

The reason for my question, I am running Symantec Endpoint Manager on a Windows XP desktop. Once I added more than 10 clients I started running into issues (some clients connecting, some not… database not accessible, etc.)

Any comments or suggestions appreciated. Thanks.
I’ve asked on other forums but not getting enough direct answers. Yahoo answers is usually pretty quick.

there should be a registry key to modify the maximum connection limit. Do a search online. Also, why are you posting this on Yahoo answers? You sound like you are running this at your job. If you an IT Prof, post this on a IT forum or something like that. Questions like this are not going to get the best answers on Yahoo (no offense to Yahoo Answers users but it’s the truth).
Try posting this on http://www.tek-tips.com/, http://windowsitpro.com/Forums/, or http://forums.cnet.com/. There are also more.

Try this… http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=237282. Sorry I would research for you more but don’t have time right now


957 Responses to “Virtualized Server OS on Windows XP, Limitations?”

  1. One more thing to say is that an online business administration diploma is designed for students to be able to without problems proceed to bachelors degree programs. The 90 credit college degree meets the other bachelor diploma requirements and when you earn your associate of arts in BA online, you will get access to the modern technologies in this field. Several reasons why students want to be able to get their associate degree in business is because they may be interested in this area and want to obtain the general training necessary before jumping in a bachelor college diploma program. Many thanks for the tips you provide within your blog.

  2. Just about all of whatever you assert is astonishingly precise and it makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this in this light before. Your article truly did turn the light on for me personally as far as this particular topic goes. But there is actually one particular factor I am not too cozy with so while I attempt to reconcile that with the central theme of your point, permit me observe exactly what the rest of the readers have to point out.Very well done.

  3. A lot of the things you mention is supprisingly accurate and it makes me ponder why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. Your article really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this specific issue goes. Nonetheless there is actually one factor I am not really too comfortable with and whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the actual central theme of the point, allow me observe what all the rest of your readers have to say.Nicely done.

  4. Hey There. I found your blog the use of msn. That is a really neatly written article. I¡¦ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.

  5. Can I simply say what a reduction to seek out someone who actually is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You definitely know learn how to convey a problem to light and make it important. Extra individuals need to learn this and understand this facet of the story. I cant believe youre no more in style since you undoubtedly have the gift.

  6. Hip Hop says:

    I used to be very pleased to find this net-site.I wished to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I definitely enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you weblog post.

  7. There are some interesting points in time in this article but I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as well

Leave a Reply