For a fact that I know that you are apprehensive about this transaction, I would not react to the statement made in your reply.Before proceeding further, I kindly want you to have an overview of the situation surrounding the claims and why I have contacted you.

In order to put you in the picture, it is important that I clarify the fact that your assistance is needed for this claims proceedings because my deceased client; Late Mr. Morris Armstrong has no beneficiary inscribed to claim his balance left behind at the finance firm. This is because it was the intention of my client as per his instruction in the codicil and last testament that after his demise, his estate should be bequeathed to charity organisations since he had already lost is wife and only daughter whom should have been the possible next of kin’s. Unfortunately, during the process or re-amending the testament it happened that no provision was made for the account holding the said funds which leaves the fortune without a beneficiary.

Since (year 2001)the demise of my client all effort to locate his extended relative and family members through their consulate and foreign affairs ministry on this matter has proved futile. It is also important to stress that after several efforts had proved futile in locating any survival or relative to my deceased client, I had no other option than to use the Surname of my client to make research through a Research Company in China to track any close relative. It was during my research I came across your contact which I prayed upon before I decided to contact you.

To be honest with you, I can not tell whether or not you are directly or indirectly related to my client but the fact that your surname tallies with that of my deceased client, makes you eligible to stand for claims as his next of kin/beneficiary. I do want you to understand that I have what it takes and the ability to make this proceedings work out perfectly as all arrangements will be done legitimately to ensure no laws are infringed.(Rest assured that the proceedings will be conducted smoothly without any legal ramification).

Furthermore, as per Malaysian banking regulation, an inoperative account can not exist more than seven years; after two years the account would be placed under dormant vault, then after another four- five years (depending on the state laws) the account would be closed as unclaimed bill if the next of kin or relatives to the account holder/beneficiary fails to claim the fund left in the account.

Sometime during January, I received a notification letter from the finance firm with an ultimatum to present the beneficiary/next of kin before 26th July 2008 or have the account closed as unclaimed bill. Another question is when this account is closed as unclaimed bill what happens to the money, the answer is this; 70% of the total sum goes into government treasury account at the apex government Bank, while 30% of this fund is shared amongst the Governing Board of the Bank. You will agree with me that leaving this fortune to disappear into thin air is senseless when I have all the facilities required to claim this fund through your help.

My thoughts are that; if you are not actually interested in pursuing this claims for your personal interest, we could as well collaborate to make this proceedings work out and have a major portion of the funds donated to charity organisation to help humanity. I beleive this would be worth while rather than forfeiting the funds to some top bank and Government officials.

I trust that you would understand my reasons for contacting you and see the need to cooperate with me in a fair and honest manner. Upon reading from you, I shall furnish you with the complete details as to how this transaction will be executed. I have herewith attached a scanned copy of my international passport and death certificate of my client for the sake of clarity,trust and proper identification. Kindly call me urgently as soon as you receive this mail

SCAM SCAM SCAM

Hi everyone,
I asked this earlier but didn’t get replies. So, I have been thinking and I would personally much rather go for a gorgeous girl that is a bit fuller figure say US 10-12/UK 14-16 with a gorgeous face rather than your typicl skinny bimbo with the fake hair and teeth etc.
Do you think if a girl that was about this size approached you you would still go for it on the provision that she was still attractive? Someone I liken to this physique is the singer Adele who is a bit bigger but still beautiful.
Pics of adele;

http://www.marieclaire.co.uk/imageBank/a/Adele-Gallery.jpg

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/prime-minister-thanks-adele-for-keeping-britain-happy-in-dark-times_1105885

http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/tag/adele/

This has nothing to do with me personally, I am thin and married I am just womdering because I think this sort of size/look is gorgeous.
oh and I forgot to say I am a woman. I was thinking I could stand to gain a bit of weight to be a bit more sexy, not as much as adele but maybe a UK12/US8 sort of size. That is me in my profile pic a few years ago but I am still the same size as I was in the pic.
HD I agree about the "what real men want" but as I said I am not an overweight woman trying to make myself feel better.

Face trumps figure to a point. The girl in the images is well beyond that point.

a. signing of the Treaty of Amiens
b. signign of the Treaty of Verdun
c. Battle of Hastings
d. Battle of Tours

2. The office of the shogunate was introduced into Japan by the ?
a. Minamoto family
b. Yi family
c. Ashikaga family
d. Fujiwara family

3. The provisions of the Magna Carta considered to be the most important dealt with the?
a. rights of the nobles
b. outlawing of feudalism
c. freeing of slaves
d. rights of the people

4. Song artisans created cases thin as eggshells from?
a. ceramic
b. porcelain
c. paper
d. clay

1. C
2. A
3. D
4. B

United States House of Representatives
Statement on HR 1424
October 3, 2008

Madame Speaker, only in Washington could a bill demonstrably worse than its predecessor be brought back for another vote and actually expect to gain votes. That this bailout was initially defeated was a welcome surprise, but the power-brokers in Washington and on Wall Street could not allow that defeat to be permanent. It was most unfortunate that this monstrosity of a bill, loaded up with even more pork, was able to pass.

The Federal Reserve has already injected hundreds of billions of dollars into US and world credit markets. The adjusted monetary base is up sharply, bank reserves have exploded, and the national debt is up almost half a trillion dollars over the past two weeks. Yet, we are still told that after all this intervention, all this inflation, that we still need an additional $700 billion bailout, otherwise the credit markets will seize and the economy will collapse. This is the same excuse that preceded previous bailouts, and undoubtedly we will hear it again in the future after this bailout fails.

One of the most dangerous effects of this bailout is the incredibly elevated risk of moral hazard in the future. The worst performing financial services firms, even those who have been taken over by the government or have filed for bankruptcy, will find all of their poor decision-making rewarded. What incentive do Wall Street firms or any other large concerns have to make sound financial decisions, now that they see the federal government bailing out private companies to the tune of trillions of dollars? As Congress did with the legislation authorizing the Fannie and Freddie bailout, it proposes a solution that exacerbates and encourages the problematic behavior that led to this crisis in the first place.

With deposit insurance increasing to $250,000 and banks able to set their reserves to zero, we will undoubtedly see future increases in unsound lending. No one in our society seems to understand that wealth is not created by government fiat, is not created by banks, and is not created through the manipulation of interest rates and provision of easy credit. A debt-based society cannot prosper and is doomed to fail, as debts must either be defaulted on or repaid, neither resolution of which presents this country with a pleasant view of the future. True wealth can only come about through savings, the deferral of present consumption in order to provide for a higher level of future consumption. Instead, our government through its own behavior and through its policies encourages us to live beyond our means, reducing existing capital and mortgaging our future to pay for present consumption.

The money for this bailout does not just materialize out of thin air. The entire burden will be borne by the taxpayers, not now, because that is politically unacceptable, but in the future. This bailout will be paid for through the issuance of debt which we can only hope will be purchased by foreign creditors. The interest payments on that debt, which already take up a sizeable portion of federal expenditures, will rise, and our children and grandchildren will be burdened with increased taxes in order to pay that increased debt.

As usual, Congress has show itself to be reactive rather than proactive. For years, many people have been warning about the housing bubble and the inevitable bust. Congress ignored the impending storm, and responded to this crisis with a poorly thought-out piece of legislation that will only further harm the economy. We ought to be ashamed.

Ron Paul…..
wow truth from a politician who would have thunk it?

I would vote for Mr. Paul if he had even a slim chance of winning. He is closer to John McCain and a true patriot.

Mr. Paul is only wrong about fiat currency. He needs a better understanding of macro economics. In every other way he is correct, including improper governmental manipulation of fiat currency.

Barry is more like a true Socialist.

Choix du’Jour
Please watch this short video. President Clinton was talking about why Democrats should vote for McCain, but it applies to you too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKGuceHEcEI&feature=related

How to reduce your storage footprint with VMware vSphere 4 and EMC Storage

Duration : 0:2:43

Read the rest of this entry »

Its not rocket science that we don’t have anywhere near the doctors and nurses to provide quality heath care for all 306,419,742 people in America, so with everyone taking advantage of it the government will have to really tighten the eligibility of medical provisions such as making the "too old" age for lower and making the "too young" age higher for many transplants and other treatments to be sure that the person who they think will get the most use out of it gets it.

It takes about 10 years and some serious coin to train doctors but soon their services will be nothing more than free swag in America’s goodie bag. The way I see it it’ll be like walking across the desert with a bottle of water – if you try to spread it out thin so it lasts the whole way and you will dehydrate without even noticing and die with a half full bottle of water left.

How will we pay to train all those doctors when that’s just what we’re not doing anymore, paying, and the government is so far in debt?

Very inefficiently — just as all Government insurance programs are run — VA Hospitals — Medicare — Medicaid.

They always come to the cross road when the money runs out:
1. Raise taxes
2. Reduce user benefits

Enjoy good medical while you have it.